|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Two hundred and twenty eight deprived children were compared with a matched sample of more endowed children living in the same urban area. Both groups were served by the same experienced primary health care team. The deprived group had a significantly higher number of general practitioner consultations and admissions to hospital (aged under 5) and a significantly higher recorded prevalence of mental and psychological disturbance (aged 5-15). Accident and emergency attendances were significantly higher for the deprived group throughout childhood, as were non-attendances for medical care appointments. The deprived group had much worse rates of immunisation and significantly later immunisations; practical measures subsequently adopted to improve this uptake of immunisation are described.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Henderson, C. Millett, and N. Thorogood Perceptions of childhood immunization in a minority community: qualitative study J R Soc Med, May 1, 2008; 101(5): 244 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G McLean, M Sutton, and B Guthrie Deprivation and quality of primary care services: evidence for persistence of the inverse care law from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework. J Epidemiol Community Health, November 1, 2006; 60(11): 917 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S P Conway Opportunistic immunisation in hospital Arch. Dis. Child., November 1, 1999; 81(5): 422 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Gemperline, J. Brockert, and L. M. Osborn Preventive Health Care Utilization: Prenatal and the First 3 Years in a Utah Population Clinical Pediatrics, January 1, 1989; 28(1): 34 - 37. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
| ARCH DIS CHILD | FETAL NEONATAL ED | ED PRACTICE |