ADC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 3 August 2007. doi:10.1136/adc.2006.113886
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2008;93:303-306
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
adc.2006.113886v1
93/4/303    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradbury, M J E
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bradbury, M J E
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M D

Original articles

A comparative study of anticoagulant control in patients on long-term warfarin using home and hospital monitoring of the international normalised ratio

M J E Bradbury, G Taylor, P Short, M D Williams

Department of Haematology, The Birmingham Children’s Hospital NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr M D Williams, Department of Haematology, The Birmingham Children’s Hospital NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK; mike.williams{at}bch.nhs.uk

Background: Capillary whole-blood point-of-care prothrombin-INR (PT-INR) testing at home is an alternative to hospital-based monitoring for patients on lifelong warfarin.

Aim: To retrospectively assess the safety and efficacy of home point-of-care testing for children on long-term warfarin.

Method: All patients who had been on point-of-care home monitoring for at least 6 months were included in the study. Their warfarin control was assessed while on home monitoring and compared to that achieved in a similar period before changing from hospital monitoring.

Results: Thirty-seven patients were studied for a mean of 1.0 year on clinic monitoring and 1.07 years on home monitoring. The clinic monitoring tests were within a therapeutic range for a median 70.0 (inter-quartile range 34.5) and the home monitoring were within range for median 75.0 (inter-quartile range 44.5). There were no major haemorrhagic or thrombotic complications in either group during the study period. Only 2.3% of all tests had an INR greater than 6.0 with no statistical differences seen between the clinic and home monitoring groups.

Conclusion: Home point-of-care testing in children on lifelong warfarin is safe, effective and offers a number of advantages to the child and family. Ongoing training and support for the families is essential for this service.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health